Skip to content

Resources

Good vs needs work

Synthetic examples written for ScribEN. Each committed page represents a full class period of work.

Exemplary
Continued from page 11
Oct 26, 2026

Prop guard bracket — concept 2

Purpose: Design a bracket that keeps the guard 15 mm from the prop tip

Activity: Prop guard project#example
Page
12

Concept 1 (page 11) flexed when I pushed the guard, so I moved the support closer to the motor. This shows the arm length was the problem, not the material.

60 mm12 mmPETG, 3 mm wall
Figure: Fig. 4 — bracket concept 2, side view
Calculation · Clearance check
c = r_guard − r_prop
r_guard = 142 mmr_prop = 127 mm
Result: c = 15 mm

Why this formula: Clearance is the gap between the guard radius and the prop tip radius.

SourceExample Plastics. (2025). PETG technical data sheet (sample). ManufacturerChose PETG over PLA for impact resistance.

Problem & fix

First print warped at the corner. Fix: added a 3 mm fillet and printed with a brim. Next: test fit on Monday and measure deflection under a 200 g load.

  • Title, purpose and a link to the previous page (continued from p.11)
  • Explains why the design changed, using what was observed
  • Labeled, dimensioned sketch with units and a material callout
  • Calculation written formula → values with units → result, with a reason
  • Research cited and connected to a decision
  • Problem, fix and next step recorded — someone else could repeat it
Needs work
Oct 26, 2026

bracket

#example
Page
7

Made the bracket. Partner printed it. Didn't really work but whatever, will fix later.

  • No purpose; the title doesn't say what was done
  • No sketch, measurements or materials — nothing shows it was designed
  • No explanation of how it should work or what went wrong
  • Doesn't show the partners' ideas or teamwork
  • One sentence can't document a full class period of work
  • Space left blank to fill in later (pages are committed as the work happens)

Engineering Notebook rubric

SPECIAL NOTE: A witness signature is not an indication of proficiency. Signatures are given each time a student completes a page. Feedback is provided during the signing and all changes, modifications, additions, etc are expected to be performed

Row4 Advanced3.5 Accomplished3 Competent2 Emerging1 Beginning
Analysis
Scientific Methodology
Demonstrates advanced reasoning based on quantifiable information; judgments and conclusions are exceptionally insightfulDemonstrates competent reasoning based on quantifiable information; judgments and conclusions are somewhat insightfulDemonstrates competent reasoning based on quantifiable information; judgments and conclusions are adequate and reasonableDemonstrates emerging reasoning based on quantifiable information as exhibited by difficulty in formulating judgments or drawing conclusionsDemonstrates beginning reasoning based on quantifiable information as exhibited by difficulty understanding what constitutes quantifiable information, inability to formulate reasonable judgments and/or drawing reasonable conclusions.
Calculation
Scientific Methodology
Accurately completes calculations for the assignment and presents results clearly and concisely Chooses appropriate formulas or symbolic models to solve problems and justify choicesCalculations are completed and largely successful Chooses appropriate formulas or symbolic models to solve problems and justify choicesCalculations are completed and are somewhat successful with some minor errors Minor errors with using formulas or symbolic models to solve problems and justify choicesMay not choose the most appropriate or effective formula Calculations contain multiple errors May exhibit some problems justifying choicesCalculations may be unsuccessful or incomplete Does not appear to understand the parameters of the appropriate formula Is unable to select the right formula for the problem (decision-making unclear)
Visual Representations of Data and Information
Scientific Methodology
Produces highly effective visual representations of data (e.g. tables) or concepts (e.g. graphs)Produces competent visual representations of data with some highly effective visual representations of data (e.g. tables) or concepts (e.g. graphs)Produces competent visual representations of data.Visual representations may reflect minor flaws or inaccuraciesThe method for visually presenting information or concepts is highly inaccurate or imprecise
Design
Content and Design
Sketches are complete and annotated to show all important information. Heading information is complete and accurate.One or two sketches are not complete and are missing important information, such as measurements. Some heading information is incomplete or inaccurateSketches are missing more than half of the identification of the components. More than half of the heading information is not complete or is not accurateSketches are not complete. Heading information is not complete and is not accurate.There is little or no evidence of sketches in the notebook.
Essential Questions and Vocabulary
Content and Design
Entries demonstrate thorough understanding of lesson objectives. Responses are detailed, accurate, and show critical thinking skills.Two or three entries are incomplete, misdated, or are not a good representation of the student’s best workMore than half of the entries are incomplete, misdated, or are not a good representation of the student’s best work.Most entries are missing, and the entries that are included are not clearly identified.There is little or no evidence of essential questions or vocabulary entries the notebook.
Development and Organization
Content and Design
shows a high level of organization; sections are clearly labeled;shows evidence of organization, but not all activities are completed with appropriate information.shows limited organization, such as missing sections, and several activities are incomplete.Notebook is not complete and is missing several activities.There is no evidence of an organized notebook.
Research
Content and Design
Research is documented with appropriate citations. Research shows a variety of resources and is not limited to one or two sources.Research is documented on some topics. One or two do not have proper citation information. Research is limited to two or three resourcesResearch is randomly completed with little or no documentation of sources.There is no research other than what is available from lecture notes.There is little or no evidence of research in the notebook.
Notes
Content and Design
Notes are clearly labeled with dates and relationship to each lesson. Journal entries are thorough and dates are recorded.Notes or journal entries are labeled but are not in order.Some notes or journal entries are missing, and not all notes are labeled.Notes or journal entries are not labeled, and the notes that are included are not clearly identifiedThere is little or no evidence of notes or journal entries in the notebook.
Validations
Content and Design
Notebook is dated and signed as each page is completed by all signing parties Notebook is dated and signed by all signing parties Notebook is dated and signed by most signing parties. Some pages are missing some signatures. Notebook is not consistently dated and signed by most signing parties. over 25% of the pages are missing some signatures. There is little or no evidence of proper dates and signatures being secured.
ENP01.01 Oral Presentation
Standards
Oral Presentation Skills: Oral presentation skills exhibit clear, varied, complex language, employed for effect. Diction is precise and appropriate to the situation. Tone is mature, consistent, and appropriate for topic and audience. Non-verbal elements (attire, mannerisms, etc.) do not distract from the presentation. Presentation Materials: The visual, audio, or other presentation materials exceed professional standards, are well-integrated into the presentation, and balance, reinforce, and enhance oral components and further achieves a level of mastery over both the materials (innovative, authentic, provocative visual, audio or other presentation materials) and their use in the presentation.Oral Presentation Skills: Oral presentation skills exhibit clear and appropriate syntax, diction, tone, and non-verbal elements. Presentation Materials: The visual, audio, or other presentation materials meet professional standards, are integrated into the presentation, and do not substitute for but instead balance oral components. Oral Presentation Skills: Oral presentation skills exhibit one major problem in syntax, diction, tone, and non-verbal elements. Presentation Materials: Some of the visual, audio, or other presentation materials fail to meet professional standards, or are not integrated into the presentation, or substitute for oral components. Oral Presentation Skills: Oral presentation skills exhibit more than one major problem in syntax, diction, tone, and non-verbal elements. Presentation Materials: The visual, audio, or other presentation materials fail to meet professional standards, are poorly integrated, or are too heavily relied upon. —
ENP04.01 Data Analysis
Standards
Data Analysis: Accurately conducts simple computations and statistical analysis using collected data; correlates experimental results to known theoretical values; accounts for measurement errors and parameters that affect experimental results.Data Analysis: Accurately conducts simple computations and statistical analysis using collected data; correlates experimental results to known theoretical valuesData Analysis: Conducts simple computations and statistical analysis using collected data with minor error; reasonable correlates experimental results to known theoretical values; attempts to account for measurement errors and parameters that affect experimental results.Data Analysis: Unable to conduct simple statistical analysis on collected data; no attempt to correlate experimental results with known theoretical values; incapable of explaining measurement errors or parameters that affect the experimental results.—
ENP09.01 Concept Generation
Standards
Concept Generation: Strong evidence that the exploration process has been skillfully man.aged in ways that organize and guide the creative energies and technical expertise of the team The team decomposes the problem into a set of sub functions; a set of subsystems; a sequence of actions; and/or the set of primary client preferences. Concept Generation: Evidence that the exploration process has been managed in ways that organize and guide the creative energies and technical expertise of the student The team conducts a cursory problem decomposition process. Concept Generation: Struggles to organize the exploration process in a way that best guides the creative energies and technical expertise of the team. The team does not conduct a cursory problem decomposition process. Concept Generation: Little or no evidence of organization in the concept exploration process. The team does not conduct a cursory problem decomposition process. —

Wording from the course's Engineering Notebook Assignment Sheet. Your teacher may reword descriptors or change weights for your class; the original stays available. Level names are ScribEN display labels.

Record rules: paper → ScribEN

The pages should be numbered ahead of time
Page numbers are assigned by the server in strict sequence the moment an entry is committed — never chosen, reused or skipped.
Your name, beginning date, course title, and other identifying information should be clearly displayed
The notebook cover page shows your alias (never your real name), start date and course.
Pages should be clearly dated
Every committed page carries a server timestamp; your own date line can't be back-dated.
Pages should never be torn out
Committed pages can't be deleted by anyone. A page can be marked void with a reason, but stays in the notebook.
Pages should not be skipped, except for the first few pages where you can include a Table of Contents
Numbering has no gaps. Table of contents is generated automatically.
Begin each laboratory experience with a title and purpose
Templates for labs open with a Title and Purpose heading that must be filled before commit.
All entries should be in ink
“Ink” = committed. Drafts can be erased; committed content can only be amended.
You should daily sign and date your engineering notebook
Sign each page as you commit it; the dashboard reminds you about unsigned pages.
All information should be legible
Typed text stays legible; handwriting and sketches are kept as drawn and can carry a typed caption.
Any mistakes should be lined through, not erased or blacked out
Corrections appear as a single line through the original, with your alias, date and reason — the original stays readable.
All factors should be clearly labeled with units
Formula blocks require a unit on every quantity; values without units are flagged before commit.
All calculations should be made in a logical way
Formula blocks show formula → substitution → result in order.
If a calculation or summary statement is found incorrect, draw a neat “X” through it
An “X-out” amendment draws a neat X over an incorrect calculation or summary, with a reason.
If data is changed, write a brief explanation of the change
A data-change amendment requires a written explanation and keeps the old value visible.
Data should not be copied into your scientific notebook from another source, to include your lab partner’s notebook, without clear acknowledgement of the source
Data imported from someone else must carry a source acknowledgement.
Pictures or electronically produced materials pasted or taped in the notebook should be initialed or signed across the edge
Inserted photos and files record their capture time and provenance and are covered by your page signature.
Your observations should not be collected elsewhere and then transferred into your scientific notebook
Imported work is labelled “imported” or “reconstructed” with its original date if known — it is never presented as contemporaneous.
Your scientific notebook should periodically be peer reviewed and initialed by them
Peer review signatures are a separate signature type with initials and date.
It should contain enough information in the event someone wants or needs to duplicate your findings following your procedures
Procedure and materials sections help someone else reproduce your work; the Academy’s reproducibility check tests this.

Notebook templates

Blank
Paper
Wide ruled
Paper
College ruled
Paper
Dot grid
Paper
Graph 5 mm
Paper
Engineering grid
Paper
Isometric
Paper
Polar
Paper
Circuits
Starts with sections
Flight / Mission
Starts with sections
Lab data table
Starts with sections
Technical drawing title block
Starts with sections
Start a page